income and the nature of his work; and based on his income it can decide the Alimony estimate. If my honorable colleagues agree, we dismiss the contested judgement and return the case to the subject-matter court to implement the decisions of this Memorandum. Ibrahim Muhammad Ali Altabagy Judge of the Appeal Court 28/12/2015 Agree Hamid Alameen Abdallah 28/12/2015 I agree, and I add that what the Trial Court estimated is not the Subsistence Alimony; to impose this type of Alimony, a knowledge of the Respondents financial Situation is required, in addition to an investigation and verification of his income and work. Also, it is not true that the Respondent did not obey the Marriage Obedience term and thus to be deprived of an Alimony. as long as there is no judgement committing the Respondent to this, and the Respondent did not refrain to fulfil it.it is actually to the contrary, that the Court judgement came to rejected the claim of obedience. Salah Mahgub Sied Ahmed Seal of: Chief Judge of the Appeals’ Court 31/12/2015 Final Order Revoke the contested Court Decision and return the case papers to the Subject-matter Trial Court to implement according to this memorandum, and to hear any necessary witnesses’ testimonies. Salah Mahgub Sied Ahmed Seal of: Chief Judge of the Appeals’ Court 31/12/2015