Number/M.Ein./F.J/86/2017 – Continues. From our part, we believe the direction we have been following in this Division is that the Child Law is a special law that has determined the Child age, while the Criminal Law spoke about puberty; and that the Courts are not the entity to cancel a law or deem it unconstitutional; and that it is the Constitutional Court’s responsibility to decide. And until the Law is cancelled, its articles remain mandatory applicable, and since this stands true, Consent is thus irrelevant; and since the conviction and punishment were legally sound, we therefore decide to uphold the contested Judgment and dismiss the Motion, if both my two honorable colleagues agree. Mr. Tariq Al-Daw Ayoub Judge of the High Court 14/04/2017 Al-Araki Al-Rayah Al-Elaish Musa Alniel El-Mukashfi Judge of the High Court Judge of the High Court 14/02/2017 15/02/2017 The Final Decision: The Motion request is Dismissed. Mr. Tariq Al-Daw Ayoub Judge of the High Court 15/02/2017 [Signature of Courts Judges sighted. Handwriting Note added: “No Change. Alshibly Ahmed Abdalla Signature.08/08/2017. Appeal.”]