cou c) finds who recorded the PW8, the pal statement, would not have secured such personal information from any other source. Th~ , __<;l) that th med me is .corroborated in_ a materiaL I .Exhibit-No-1.ln-his-reportrtlie-said-doctordid not-find-any-semen·whieh position is with what in his own accused ment that; "I did. not ejaculate1' . The d did not contest the fa that victim experienced sexual intercourse. cou is that PWS experienced sexual intercourse and that fi supportive evidence an independent nature confi that the did occur. In nt with Assessors, the court finds that the prosecution has proved beyond reasonable doubt, fact the victim experienced sexual intercourse. Whether the accused's participated in a sexual act with the victim? The testified that he had left home for work early that arrested at Kulusambiya at around 1 statement however, the havi earl admits m, before getting 1 have returned at home that the accused come into the room at around in trod Kakira. In his m however denies the offence.PWS, testified left at 6am. PWS knew the and was as m. maternal uncle. as such by her mother.PW. testified that she would lk to the accused whenever she visited her grandmother du had and school holidays. On this point the in his cha and caution statement following: "I have brothers and sisters and among them is Aidah, who is 9