4. Evidence of the lower Court crystallize that the appellant is not educated or lettered, not to talk of being a lawyer. GROUND SEVEN The learned trial Judge erred in law when he held as follows:In the light of the entirety of the above evaluation of the evidence led in proof of his charge by the prosecution, I hold that the prosecution by the totality of the evidence adduced in this case has successfully discharged the burden of proving the guilt of the accused in this charge beyond reasonable doubt. PARTICULARS OF ERROR 1. The prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt through credible evidence that the appellant and no other person raped the PW1. 2. The learned trial Judge did not consider evidence of the appellant to the fact that Exhibit p3 was not obtained voluntarily. GROUND EIGHT The judgment of the lower Court is unreasonable and cannot be supported having regard to the weight of evidence. The appellant, in order to activate the prosecution of the appeal was armed with the appellants brief of argument, dated and filed on 20th December, 2016. The respondents brief of argument, was settled by I. I. Alobu, Esq., Director of Public Prosecutions, Ministry of Justice, Abakaliki, (with F. N. Nteoma, Esq., Chief State Counsel, J. U. Chukwu, Esq., Principal State Counsel, Miss Chinyere Anoke,