Previous 1 / 20 Next

RÉPUBLIQUE DU KENYA Haute Cour de Meru Pétition 8 de 2012 C.K. (un enfant) via Ripples International en tant que tuteur et plus proche ami) .....................................1er PÉTITIONNAIRE F.K. (un enfant) via Ripples International en tant que tuteur et plus proche ami) .....................................2ème PÉTITIONNAIRE M.M. (un enfant) via Ripples International en tant que tuteur et plus proche ami) ....................................3ème PÉTITIONNAIRE E.K.M. (un enfant) via Ripples International en tant que tuteur et plus proche ami) ................................... 4ème PÉTITIONNAIRE P.K. (un enfant) via à Ripples International en tant que tuteur et plus proche ami) ....................................5ème PÉTITIONNAIRE M.N.M. (un enfant) via Jane Mwakiuma en tant que tuteur et plus proche ami) ....................................6ème PÉTITIONNAIRE Y.N. (un enfant) via Gladys Ng'inombabu en tant que tuteur et plus proche ami) ....................................7ème PÉTITIONNAIRE L.W. (un enfant) via Ripples International en tant que tuteur et plus proche ami) .................................. 8ème PÉTITIONNAIRE PAMELA WARUGURU......................................................................................................................... ...................................9ème PÉTITIONNAIRE I.K. (un enfant) via Ripples International en tant que tuteur et plus proche ami) ...................................10ème PÉTITIONNAIRE T.M. (un enfant) via Gakii en tant que tuteur et plus proche ami) ................................... .................................. 11ème PÉTITIONNAIRE RIPPLES INTERNATIONAL................................................................................................................... ...................................12ème PÉTITIONNAIRE

Select target paragraph3

● ● ●

Petition 8 of 2012: C.K and al. (petitioners) versus Commissioner of Police/Inspector General of the National Police Service et al. (respondent)

Cases

Country

Latitude: -1.303208

Longitude: 36.777356712

Country (linked Cases): Kenya

Court: Kenya: High Court, Kenya

Date of judgement: May 27, 2013

Complainant: C.K. et al.

Articles alleged: Constitution of Kenya, Articles 2 10 19 21 22 23 27 28 29 48 50(1) and 53; Universal Declaration of Human Rights, Articles 1 2 3 5 7 8 and 10; African Charter on the Rights and Welfare of the Child, Articles 1 2 3 4 16 and 27; African Charter of Human and Peoples Rights, Articles 2 3 4 5 6 7 and 8; Children Act, Section 3 5 15 and 22; Sexual Offences Act; Police Act

Articles violated: Constitution of Kenya (2010), Articles 21(1), 21(3), 27, 28, 29, 48, 50(1) and 53(1) (c); Universal Declaration of Human Rights, Articles 1 to 8 (inclusive) and 10; United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child, Articles 2, 4, 19, 34 and 39; African Charter on the Rights and Welfare of the Child, Articles 1, 3, 4,16 and 27; African Charter on Human and Peoples' Rights, Articles 2 to 7 (inclusive) and 18

Keywords

Child abuse
Defilement (Rape of children)
Investigation
Police
Sexual offences

Gender of victim

Female: Girl (under 18)

Gender of accused/perpetrator

Gender not specified

Language: English

Summary: The petition was submitted by ten children, Pamela Waruguru and Ripples International. The petition was brought under Articles 2, 10, 19, 21, 22, 23, 27, 28, 29, 48, 50(1) and 53 of the Constitution of Kenya, 2010, Article 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8 and 10 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, Articles 1, 2, 3, 4, 16 and 27 of the African Charter on the Rights and Welfare of the Child, Articles 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8 of the African Charter of Human and Peoples Rights, Section 3, 5 15 and 22 of the Children Act 2001 (Chapter 141) of the Laws of Kenya, the Sexual Offences Act, 2006 (Act No.3 of 2006 and the Police Act (Chapter 84) of the Laws of Kenya. The petitions sought a series of reliefs, including: 1. A declaration to the effect that the neglect, omission, refusal and/or failure of the police to conduct prompt, effective, proper and professional investigations into the first eleven petitioners’ complaints of defilement violates their fundamental rights and freedoms. Each of the 11 petitioners were on all material dates relevant to these proceedings a “Child” and a victim of “Child abuse” and “defilement” as respectively defined under the Children Act, 2001 and the Sexual Offence Act, 2006. They made reports of the acts of defilement at various police stations within Meru County and the police officers at those various Police Stations neglected, omitted, refused and or otherwise failed to conduct prompt, effective, proper and professional Investigation into the petitioners’ complaints. A declaration is made to the effect that the neglect, omission, refusal and/or failure of the police to conduct prompt, effective, proper and professional investigations into the first eleven petitioners’ complaints of defilement violates the first eleven petitioner’s fundamental rights and freedoms. An order of mandamus be and is hereby made directing the Commissioner of Police/Inspector General of the National Police Service together with his agents, delegates and/or subordinates to conduct prompt, effective, proper and professional investigations into the 1st to 11th petitioners’ respective complaints of defilement and other forms of sexual violence.

Primary Documents

Kenya-case-High Court-Meru-CK et al-Petition 8 of 2012-2013-eng.pdf
English
Download View
Kenya-cas-Haute Cour de Meru-C.K. et autres-Petition 8 de 2012-2013-fr-pdf.pdf
French
Download View