equitable sharing of the joint property derived from the marriage. Having said this, may I also add that this Court is vested with the power to make any order that is deemed appropriate in circumstances of a given case to determine the real issues in controversy and to ensure that the rights of the parties are adequately safeguarded. Rules 35 and 36 of the Rules of this Court state as follows: Rule 35 states as follows: “The Court may from time to time make any order necessary for determining the real question in controversy in the appeal, and may amend any defect or error in the record of appeal, and may direct the Court below to enquire into and certify its finding on any question which the Court thinks fit to determine before final judgment in the appeal, and may make any interim order or grant any injunction which the Court below is authorised to make or grant and may direct any necessary enquires or accounts to be made or taken and generally shall have as full jurisdiction over the whole proceedings as if the proceedings had been instituted and prosecuted in the Court as a Court of first instance, and may re-hear the whole case, or may remit it to the Court below to be reheard, or to be otherwise dealt with as the Court directs.” Rule 36 states as follows: CA – JUDGMENT MATTY FAYE V DAWDA JAWARA Page 20