IHRDA SGBV Database

The Beneficent, The Merciful Form No.: 8 Personal Law Courts Sudan Judiciary The Republic of the Sudan The Judiciary Authority Summarized Copy Summary of Legal Execution

The Beneficent, The Merciful Form No.: 8 Personal Law Courts Sudan Judiciary The Republic of the Sudan The Judiciary Authority Summarized Copy Summary of Legal Execution

The Beneficent, The Merciful Form No.: 8 Personal Law Courts Sudan Judiciary The Republic of the Sudan The Judiciary Authority Summarized Copy Summary of Legal Execution

Saudi Arabia and stayed there for four months. He returned to Sudan in August 2007 and stayed in Sudan till October. Then he left with him to Singa, specifically the

is not in existence in the father see (objection rule in the precedent 35/1987 Sudan Law Journal Report 87 page 34 – The allegation that there is a mistake in

The Federal Supreme Court Red Sea and Kasla States Circuit Port Sudan Abdalrawoof Hasballah Malasy Ibrahim Mohammed Almaki Mohammed Abu-Bakr Mahmoud President Member Member The

Merciful The National Supreme Court Department of the Red Sea and Kassallah Port Sudan Headed by the Honourable Judges: Mr. Abdul Raouf Hassab Allah Malassi …. Chairman

National Supreme Court Circuit of Red Sea and Kasala States Port-Sudan Before: H.E./ Abdulraouf Hassab Allah …………. President. H.E./ Ibrahim Mohammed Almaki…. Member H.E./ Ibrahim

The Merciful The National Supreme Court Department of the Red Sea and Kasala Port Sudan Headed by the Honourable Judges: Mr. Abdul Raouf Hassab Allah Malassi …. Chairman

Suleiman Baliha To: Mr. Shoaib Abu Baker Musa/Lawyer/Port Sudan C/O Mr. Head of Notification Office – Port Sudan With reference to the application presented by you on

claim of the respondent is only filed on deceit, for he resides outside of Sudan and did not attend the procedures of the came which proves that he is not

dowry was named as a show off and that his witnesses are residing outside of Sudan and therefore difficult to be called upon to the proceeding and that the concerned

nationwide among which is the Child Act. It is applicable to the States of North Sudan according to Article (5/1) of the transitional Constitution for 2005. We are neither

of the custody and she is more better to that because plaintiff travels outside Sudan often. On 26/03/2015, the Trial Court issued its judgment in the presence of the

other legally acceptable evidence. In the previous judgment of the Government of the Sudan against Yusuf Abdullah (Journal of Judicial Judgments 1972 page 216), it is decided

provisions under Article (5) of Sudan Transitional Constitution and the Judgment Rule Law. Sharia is the main source of law in Sudan and we believe that it is the

the elder son is 18 years and a student at the Faculty of Engineering – Sudan University and he takes daily amount of SP40 for his breakfast and transport, the

1998 since they were in the State of Libya. Those allegations were repeated in Sudan when they were residing in Dar Elsalam –the abuse. The act was done by a

Amir was lagging far behind in his education in the Faculty of Engineering at Sudan University which he joined in 2004, and reached a level at which his counterparts

to be 18 years. See (the precedent (Sudan Government v. m. ein. / No / m .ein / m.t. / 199/2014 published in Sudan law Journal Report 2015 page 48. There

conventions ratified by Government of Sudan. Both opinions and judicial applications have their rule in legislation and a support from Sudan Transitional Constitution for 2005. Child